ARE BOOSTER SHOTS FOR THE COVID VACCINE AVAILABLE IN MEXICO?

[happyjillin]

3 hours ago, ibarra said:

 

From Naturalnews.com  December 10, 2021

A new paper published in The Lancet suggests that the more “vaccines” a person gets injected with for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), the faster his or her body succumbs to an AIDS-like immune wasting syndrome called VAIDS.

Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome begins immediately following the first round of injections. And experts worry that with each subsequent “booster” shot, this process of “immune erosion,” as they call it, only continues to accelerate.

For their research, scientists compared the health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated people in Sweden. Roughly 1.6 million individuals in both groups were studied over the course of nine months.

What was discovered is that the fully vaccinated only have a smattering of immune protection for a very short amount of time – at most six months. After that, the artificial “immunity” provoked by the injections wanes rapidly, leaving a fully vaccinated person with no protection against infection of any kind, just like AIDS.

The unvaccinated, meanwhile, were found to maintain true and lasting immunity because their bodies were not jabbed with immune degrading spike proteins and other mystery chemicals that we now know chip away at the immune system week after week post-injection.

“Doctors are calling this phenomen[on] in the repeatedly vaccinated ‘immune erosion’ or ‘acquired immune deficiency,’ accounting for elevated incidence of myocarditis and other post-vaccine illnesses that either affect them more rapidly, resulting in death, or more slowly, resulting in chronic illness,” reported America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) about the study’s findings.

Covid jabs initiate a cascading failure of the body’s immune response

It is important to remember that Covid vaccines are not actually vaccines, at least not in the traditional sense. What they do is cause cells throughout the body to produce just one small portion of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus: the spike protein.

As we have long warned, these injections are turning people’s bodies into walking spike protein factories, which causes the body to create antibodies to them. There are serious problems with this, however, that lead to the progressive degradation of the body’s immune capacity and functionality.

“First, these vaccines ‘mis-train’ the immune system to recognize only a small part of the virus (the spike protein),” AFLDS explains. “Variants that differ, even slightly, in this protein are able to escape the narrow spectrum of antibodies created by the vaccines.”

“Second, the vaccines create ‘vaccine addicts,’ meaning persons become dependent upon regular booster shots, because they have been ‘vaccinated’ only against a tiny portion of a mutating virus,” the group adds. “Australian Health Minister Dr. Kerry Chant has stated that COVID will be with us forever and people will ‘have to get used to’ taking endless vaccines. ‘This will be a regular cycle of vaccination and revaccination.'”

A third thing is the simple fact that the jabs do not in any way prevent infection in the nose and upper airways, which is where fully vaccinated people tend to show the highest viral loads. This causes the fully vaccinated to become those ever-dreaded “super  spreaders” and a serious danger to society.

Former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson warns that the indefinite and uncontrolled autoimmune response to the coronavirus spike protein that is provoked by these injections could produce “a wave of antibodies called anti-$%&/()ype antibodies or Ab2s that continue to damage human bodies long after clearing either Sars-CoV-2 itself or those spike proteins that the shots cause the body’s cells to produce.”

The spike proteins themselves may produce this second wave of antibodies as well, modulating the immune system’s initial response by binding with and ultimately destroying the first wave of antibodies.

---

In a previous career,I had a subscription to The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine which are the 2 top periodicals in the field and I was and still am capable of understanding what is printed  therein. I just went to the Lancet site and found no such article.

[gringal]

Couldn't resist:

 

• • • Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on the promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right-wing bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet. Founded in 2005, Natural News is a conspiracy and pseudoscience website that routinely publishes false information.
    mediabiasfactcheck.com/natural-news/

    Natural News - Media Bias/Fact Check

[MtnMama]

Currently about 73% of US adults over 18 are fully vaxxed, and about 84% have had at least one dose. About 80% of those hospitalized with Covid are unvaccinated, and the vast majority of deaths occur in that group. Looks like Darwin is doing its job.

[Ferret]

1 hour ago, happyjillin said:

In a previous career,I had a subscription to The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine which are the 2 top periodicals in the field and I was and still am capable of understanding what is printed  therein. I just went to the Lancet site and found no such article.

I also went to the Lancet to do a search... nothing under VAIDS or Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

Ferchrissakes people, please check your sources before you make yourself look like an :().

[RickS]

On 12/11/2021 at 10:21 AM, ibarra said:

Naturalnews.com simply published an article.  The article itself was from the Lancet.   And, if you look at the sources I posted above, many people posted the same article from the Lancet.  

This is a perfect example of how irresponsible people start and perpetuate false information. And don't seem to be able to admit it when proven inaccurate. No fact checking, just put the sh*t out there when it suits one's agenda. They say, "look at how many people copied the falsehood' like I did.... so I must be right'. Geeesh

As happyj and ferret says, The Lancet never published anything remotely similar to this crap. But once a lie hits the ground, it's hard to scrape it up and put it back in the bottle.

[ibarra]

My research shows this article is on the Lancet Pre Print Server.  

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3949410

The study referenced is discussed on many sites as indicated in the links I provided earlier.  Here are 2 more sites:

https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/news/post/vaccine-acquired-immune-deficiency-syndrome-vaids-we-should-anticipate-seeing-this-immune-erosion-more-widely/ 

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/swedish-study-shows-covid-vaccines

Lancet : The epidemiological relevance of the COVID-19-vaccinated population is increasing

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(21)00258-1/fulltext?s=08#

Full text article:

https://els-jbs-prod-cdn.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/pb-assets/Lancet/pdfs/s1473309921006484-1635425926927.pdf

WSJ:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/political-bias-the-lancet-and-coronavirus-11591562091

 

[Whipstock]

43 minutes ago, ibarra said:

My research shows this article is on the Lancet Pre Print Server.  

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3949410

The study referenced is discussed on many sites as indicated in the links I provided earlier.  Here are 2 more sites:

https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/news/post/vaccine-acquired-immune-deficiency-syndrome-vaids-we-should-anticipate-seeing-this-immune-erosion-more-widely/ 

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/swedish-study-shows-covid-vaccines

Lancet : The epidemiological relevance of the COVID-19-vaccinated population is increasing

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(21)00258-1/fulltext?s=08#

Full text article:

https://els-jbs-prod-cdn.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/pb-assets/Lancet/pdfs/s1473309921006484-1635425926927.pdf

WSJ:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/political-bias-the-lancet-and-coronavirus-11591562091

 

While I remain on the side of vaccinations for protecting myself and others; You have posted some valid links that should not be ignored. Thank you.

[Ferret]

COVID-19 vaccines don’t cause immunodeficiency syndrome | AP News

PolitiFact | Claim that COVID-19 vaccinated in UK are developing immunity problems is false

I read all the links that you posted Ibarra. They all refer to the waning efficiency of the Covid vaccines. That is NOT in doubt in the cases of the mrna vaccines. What I objected to was Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency which is quite a different accusation. Acquired Immune Deficiency affects ALL defenses of immunity not just that of the Covid Vaccine. There is nothing in the Lancet about this.

Furthermore, IgM (not IgA as I previously stated) response comes first and then IgG response. And, in any case of an immune response whether it is due to a virus or a bacteria, antibodies always wane over time. Think of everything that you have ever been infected with in the course of your life. All of those antibodies are not circulating one hundred percent of the time for the rest of your life. It is the B cells (also known as memory cells) that kick into gear when needed and tell the T cells to produce the required antibodies. Antibodies are not the whole mechanism.

The Flawed Science of Antibody Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Immunity | Infectious Diseases | JAMA | JAMA Network

 

[RickS]

Well Whip I'm glad you got something out of them....

First of all, the subject of this thread has deteriorated (unheard of, I know!) to a discussion about the so-called VAIDS or Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. The Post starting this line suggested that there was an article in The Lancet describing this along with some "I'll get on this bandwagon" links to  articles to prove it exists. Turns out nothing of the sort was printed in The Lancet and the links do not substantiate anything relating to said.

Then the story was changed to "I saw it in The Lancet PrePrint Server" and some more links were given.  BUT if one looks at that Server one sees this: "PrePrints are not peer-reviewed and should not be used for clinical decision making or reporting of research to a lay audience without indicating that it is preliminary research that has not been peer-reviewed. Preprints available.... are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal."

Furthermore the links provided make NO reference to VAIDS or at least none that weren't just mocking previous misleading articles. And surely not something in The Lancet, a ploy that was used trying to add some validity to the content.

BTW, my first reason to suspect the value (to me) was when the Poster made reference to Covid-19 as the "Wuhan coronavirus".  Tells me a lot.

 

[Whipstock]

45 minutes ago, RickS said:

Well Whip I'm glad you got something out of them....

First of all, the subject of this thread has deteriorated (unheard of, I know!) 

Snip,......

BTW, my first reason to suspect the value (to me) was when the Poster made reference to Covid-19 as the "Wuhan coronavirus".  Tells me a lot.

 

My opinion isn't changed, and I agree the argument is a bit weak, but there was some info that I was unaware of. 

I think that I am like most I talk to about this, mostly if not completely on one side already.I won't argue with someone who says the world is flat, anymore than with someone who thinks it's some sort of RFID implant conspiracy.

 

There has been a mishandling of information and the media seems incompetent on most fronts. Now the FDA has gone from 55 years to 75, to release the information they based their decision to ok the use of the Pfizer shots. 

 

 

[RickS]

4 minutes ago, Whipstock said:

SNIP...... Now the FDA has gone from 55 years to 75, to release the information they based their decision to OK the use of the Pfizer shots.

Could you explain this?

[ibarra]

RickS - To clarify,  as the Poster,  I have not made any references to Covid myself.   I only provided copied information and links.  

[Whipstock]

19 minutes ago, RickS said:

Could you explain this?

I can no more explain why than they have???

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/wait-what-fda-wants-55-years-process-foia-request-over-vaccine-data-2021-11-18/

 

https://www.allsides.com/news/2021-12-08-1553/fda-says-it-now-needs-75-years-fully-release-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-data

 

[mudgirl]

4 hours ago, ibarra said:

The study referenced is discussed on many sites as indicated in the links I provided earlier.  Here are 2 more sites:

https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/news/post/vaccine-acquired-immune-deficiency-syndrome-vaids-we-should-anticipate-seeing-this-immune-erosion-more-widely/ 

That site is also a discredited site known for promoting anti-vax right wing propaganda.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90536

[happyjillin]

1 hour ago, ibarra said:

RickS - To clarify,  as the Poster,  I have not made any references to Covid myself.   I only provided copied information and links.  

DOUBLE SNORK!

[MtnMama]

The bottom line is this: I am fully vaxxed to protect myself and others. I have serious asthma so I am considered high risk. I take extra precautions. I am also protecting those who are immune-compromised and cannot get vaxxed.

This is the reality: A fully vaccinated person has a lower viral load than an unvaccinated person. A fully vaccinated person exposed to a person with Covid has a 60% or better chance of not contracting the disease at all and a higher chance of having a mild case. With the delta variant, an unvaccinated person exposed to a person with Covid has a very low chance of not contracting the disease. Exposure to an unvaccinated person with the higher viral load causes a higher risk of serious illness, hospitalization and death. 

Stop being selfish and irresponsible. I don't give a rat's fanny about your Freedums. Put on your big boy pants, wear a mask, social distance and get vaccinated. 

[RickS]

4 hours ago, Whipstock said:

I can no more explain why than they have???

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/wait-what-fda-wants-55-years-process-foia-request-over-vaccine-data-2021-11-18/https://www.allsides.com/news/2021-12-08-1553/fda-says-it-now-needs-75-years-fully-release-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-data

THAT is ludicrous! Surely that decision will get overturned. Their excuse that they 'only have 10 employees to do that work' is as feeble as many government comments/decisions!

Thanks for sharing.....

 

[Natasha]

Yes.... and mostly.......PUT ON YOUR BIG BOY PANTS and stop being do darn SELFISH!!!!!

[RickS]

4 hours ago, ibarra said:

RickS - To clarify,  as the Poster,  I have not made any references to Covid myself.   I only provided copied information and links.  

What!  What!  👎🏿

Surely you jest. Surely. 

[Whipstock]

1 hour ago, RickS said:

What!  What!  👎🏿

Surely you jest. Surely. 

As there has already been so much thread drift;

 

[bobby brown]

3 hours ago, Natasha said:

Yes.... and mostly.......PUT ON YOUR BIG BOY PANTS and stop being do darn SELFISH!!!!!

Sorry Natasha-I won't take one for the team--I'm not much of a team player--especially for the loosing team  HA

[Mainecoons]

[Ferret]

Yup. Staying alive to get my "fix" of one more day.

[Ferret]

Time Magazine "Heroes of the Year" ... a fascinating read and a good short video...

Vaccine Scientists: Heroes of the Year 2021 | Time

[AlanMexicali]

5 hours ago, Mainecoons said:

Silly.