Zeb 475 Posted February 25 Report Share Posted February 25 Screen says I am not allowed to view the response to my post. Link to post Share on other sites
cedros 998 Posted February 25 Report Share Posted February 25 https://boards.cruisecritic.com/topic/2635857-error-code-2f173k/ Link to post Share on other sites
Mainecoons 5,393 Posted February 25 Report Share Posted February 25 It went political immediately and had to be removed. That wasn't a great source you cited. I'd spend a little more time researching this, there is a lot of pro and con on that topic. Link to post Share on other sites
RickS 2,039 Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 Zeb, what I think that I'm hearing is that MC deleted your "Vaccine is not a vaccine" Post. As goofy as it was I don't understand the logic in deleting your Post but that's just me..... Link to post Share on other sites
Zeb 475 Posted February 26 Author Report Share Posted February 26 Makes no sense as I made no political commentary. posted an article written by a well known physician in Houston about the Vaccine and his view of it and his opinion on the data is being is incorrectly handled by officials. It is just a medical view point and a valid one. Evidently, there is no tolerance on this board for an anti "vaccine" opinion and I wonder why...... If in fact, a response became became political, then that one should have deleted. I think it is harmful to withhold a differing medical view point from people who want to make a health decision. Link to post Share on other sites
moderator-2 922 Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 You're probably right although the thread went into immediate ad hom and personal attack and Rick posted a blatantly political and OT response dragging up American legislators. Because of that I concluded the thread was going to just be another one sided political ranting session from the usual suspects here. It headed in that direction almost immediately. Post it again if you want but be aware that source is not the most credible. Of course instead of just posting factual rebuttals to the contention that the vaccines aren't vaccines at all would have been too easy, it was much easier to attack the source rather than what the source contended. That source BTW is not the only one raising this question and the associated concerns. Consider this an admission of my error but I am going to ride herd on the new thread mercilessly. Stick to the topic which is basically the OP contends the vaccines are not vaccines and could amount to genetic modification. There are rebutting references out there, please post them and discuss this topic like adults. And NO politics. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts