G598738 Posted July 6, 2011 Report Share Posted July 6, 2011 Nancy Grace: "tot mom, tot mom, tot mom, tot mom..............". What is wrong with THIS woman ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maggilu Posted July 6, 2011 Report Share Posted July 6, 2011 Nancy Grace obviously appeals to a significant number of people, none of whom I care to know. She is undoubtedly the rudest person on television. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RVGRINGO Posted July 6, 2011 Report Share Posted July 6, 2011 Yes, but she was able to sell her single-wide and move into a better place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slobo Posted July 6, 2011 Report Share Posted July 6, 2011 I think I'm having flashbacks to when I lived through the Tonya Harding serial stupidity series in Portland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barefootcontessa22 Posted July 7, 2011 Report Share Posted July 7, 2011 If they wanted to go home, why couldn't they have found a guilty verdict the first hour of deliberation? I watched most of the trial and although I think she did it, there wasn't any evidence the child was murdered or a connection to Casey murdering her. This is one of the few times justice really did work as it is supposed to because she wasn't convicted based on belief and instead the jury took the evidence seriously. There was too much reasonable doubt. It's a sad day for an inept police department that was called several times and told there was a body and it didn't respond to the calls, sent an officer who didn't look, and it was another 4-5 months before the body was found. If the body had been found earlier maybe enough evidence would have been on it for a conviction. They didn't declare not guilty for 10+ hours of deliberation because they had to have lunch; special smoke breaks; AND go through a mountain of paper work for each charge. They really didn't have time to deliberate much; they never sent a question to the judge; they never revisited any of the evidence; some of them didn't even take their notebooks into the deliberation room and Judge Perry gathered those up and sent them in to them. Already, some are breaking silence and negotiating paid interviews. I do agree with you about the police reaction; the officer who was negligent lost his job over it; had Caylee's body been found early-on, it's likely there would have been much more tangible evidence. However, given that it was circumstantial evidence, I think the prosecution brought it home. I think we had lazy, indifferent, greedy, and frankly uneducated jurors on this case, and it's a travesty of justice for a sweet toddler who lost her life at the hands of her own mother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moderator-2 Posted July 7, 2011 Report Share Posted July 7, 2011 I think this has absolutely nothing to do with Mexico. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.