Jump to content
Chapala.com Webboard


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Zeb

  1. If this bores you, don't bother reading or participating.
  2. Totally agree. Some just can't tolerate something that disagrees with their opinion, so they criticise the poster instead of the topic.
  3. Zeb

    Beef Prices

    Very good. Crystal clear now.
  4. Zeb

    Beef Prices

    I am not lazy or dyslexic. I saw the address, however, the location was still unclear to me as it mentions La Floresta and Ajijic. A point of reference is helpful such as the fact that it is near the Telmex Office.
  5. Zeb

    Beef Prices

    I am unclear on the location. Is in by La Floresta or is it in Ajijic?
  6. Any recommendations for a printer repair person?
  7. I am not sure how that is relevant unless he is promoting them as a cure and I did not see that in his article.
  8. Also, based on your comment no physician should ever give any opinion unless he/she could spend money on a research team. My understanding is doctor see patients and get data from labs and places that specialize in the research, and THAT is where owand h they get their data to formulate their opinions and how they advise their own patients.
  9. Nowhere my post did I claim that I had found special research on line that doctors and scientists missed. I simply posted an article written by a physician based on his opinion and expertise. Obviously, you want to make fun of what I did and it seems, for you, if I had posted an article which spoke of the medication favorably, you would be fine with that.
  10. I don't think that would make a good base line research criteria. He is providing data he obtained from other sources and certainly the 40,000 he mentions is worthy of paying attention. I did not see anywhere he claimed that buying his products would cure covid, so I don't think tha
  11. You are free to disagree with his medical expertise and opinion. He may not have his personal research team, however, I am sure he has access to research done by others as almost all doctors do. Most doctors in private practice use data from other researchers as well.
  12. A differering medical opinion does not mean it is automicatically misleading. Otherwise, it is censorship of anyone who does not agree with media reporting.
  13. And the pharmaceutical companies are also promoting their businesses and want to sell the injections.
  14. That is an incorrect assumption. I did not just see it on line, then post. I have lived in Houston and was familiar with this doctor.
  15. Well. He is obviously active in many areas and that is general information about him. Just because you may not agree with his other activism does not mean he is not medically competent. I am sure many other doctors also are involved in some form of activism.
  16. A third injection proposed. Wow! Nice money maker.
  17. So, if they give you immunity, how is it that people who have been vaccinated are getting it?
  18. Also, what bothers me is that my understanding that the function of vaccine is to prevent a disease from occuring, such as polio. Evidently these injections don't do that. They only minimize the symptoms.
  19. The moderator has suggested I repost this as he had locked it because people's responses immediately became political and went into attack mode. You may not agree with this physician's opinion and recommendations. If you do post a rebuttal, then be polite and diplomatic and please stick to the medical topic and don't turn it into a political or personal confrontation. I am currently in Houston and this was provided to his patients. I have been reluctant to participate on this board many times because of personal attacks and this should not be happening here. I post this as informational so that people can be informed about different views and each person can make his/her choice. I am asking the moderator to please only delete any responses that are political or in attack mode according to the policy of the webboard, and not deprive people of this article. The So-Called COVID-19 "Vaccine" Is Really A Dangerous Experimental Gene Therapy Just Say "No!" - Steven Hotze, M.D. The so-called COVID-19 "vaccine" is not a vaccine at all. It is an experimental gene therapy. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) gives the definition of the term vaccine on its website, https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm. A vaccine is a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease. Immunity is the protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected. This so-called COVID-19 "vaccine" does not provide the individuals who receive the vaccine with immunity to COVID-19, nor does it prevent the transmission of this disease. That is why it is a deceptive trade practice, under 15 U.S. Code, Section 41 of the Federal Trade Commission, for pharmaceutical companies who are producing this experimental gene therapy, to claim that this is a vaccine. These pharmaceutical companies are lying to the public. The government health bureaucrats are also lying to the public, by calling this treatment a vaccine. This COVID-19 injection therapy is only designed to minimize your symptoms if you were to be infected with the COVID-19 virus. Let me reemphasize that this COVID-19 experimental gene therapy does not meet the CDC’s own definition of a vaccine. It does not provide immunity or prevent transmission of the disease. By referring to this therapy as a "vaccine," the pharmaceutical companies are attempting to shield themselves, because vaccine injuries or deaths are exempted by law from any product liability lawsuits. The United States health bureaucrats initiated Operation Warp Speed to fast track the so-called COVID-19 "vaccine." On December 11, 2020, the FDA approved the Pfizer-BioNTech "vaccine," and Moderna’s was approved a week later. These "vaccines" were approved without any published animal studies and without any long-term human studies. This means that the individuals who get them are the guinea pigs. These "vaccines," which are manufactured using cells derived from human babies that were aborted in the 1970s, should more accurately be called an experimental gene therapy. They are an untested, unproven gene treatment that poses a much greater danger to your health than COVID-19 itself. Unlike Any Previous Vaccine The theory behind conventional vaccines is to inject a small amount of the infecting virus or bacteria protein into your body, which in turn will cause your immune system to produce antibodies to that infecting organism and provide you with immunity. The new COVID-19 "vaccine" is a synthetic messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) experimental gene therapy, and it works much differently. The theory behind it is that when this synthetic mRNA is injected into your body, it will insert itself into your cells and begin producing coronavirus spike proteins. In turn, your immune system is expected to produce antibodies to the coronavirus protein made by your own cells. There is no way to know how long your cells will produce these virus proteins, or if they will ever stop producing them. Your immune system will be hyper-charged and will overreact when exposed to any type of coronavirus in the future. This is what happened when mRNA experimental gene therapy was used against other types of coronaviruses in animals in 2005 and 2012. The animals died from an immune system hyper-reaction when they were later exposed to the coronavirus against which they had been previously vaccinated. This hyper-reaction is called an antibody dependent enhancement reaction. Because these are the first mRNA "vaccines" ever used in humans, you would think that they would have been first tested and proven safe in animal studies and have at least two years of human testing, which are routinely required. Instead, the COVID-19 mRNA "vaccine" was only tested on humans for a couple of months. Wouldn’t it be prudent to have long term-human studies before recommending mass vaccination? 40,000+ Adverse Effects in the First Month Adverse effects are inevitable. In the first month of use, there were more than 40,000 documented adverse reactions in the U.S., including thousands of cases of anaphylactic shock and serious neurological problems. Because only 10% of adverse effects are routinely reported, hundreds of thousands have likely been harmed. That is only in the first 30 days! As of February 14, there were also 934 deaths in individuals who had received this experimental gene therapy so-called "vaccine," including baseball great, Hank Aaron. Even more worrisome are delayed and long-term adverse effects. The synthetic mRNA "vaccine" turns on the production of COVID-19 proteins, but it has no off switch. It just keeps on replicating, and the immune system keeps on mounting an immune response. That is why some researchers are concerned that it will provoke autoimmune reactions, setting you up for a lifetime of serious inflammatory disease. Another major concern is the possibility that the COVID-19 "vaccine" can make infections worse. There is convincing evidence that this experimental gene therapy may trigger an antibody-dependent enhancement reaction and increase the virus’s ability to infect your cells. In other words, if you come down with the infection after being vaccinated, you may have a much worse case than if you had never had the "vaccine." Many experts are predicting a surge of life-threatening infections, inflammatory disorders and deaths in the coming months for those who have been vaccinated. Of course, the blame will be placed on a mutant, particularly virulent strain of the virus, rather than on a poorly tested experimental gene therapy. Even if it were acknowledged, the U.S. government, which has spent $12.4 billion on COVID-19 vaccines so far, would foot the bill for damages incurred. As I previously mentioned, by law, pharmaceutical companies cannot be sued for any injury caused by any vaccine. So, they are reaping enormous profits with no downside risk of product liability. Not Only Dangerous but Ineffective Not only is the media downplaying the "vaccine’s" side effects, but they seem content to simply repeat the drug makers’ overly optimistic claims of efficacy. You have probably heard that both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are 95% effective. This is a false claim. Yet, the medical establishment and the government bureaucrats have simply taken these pharmaceutical companies’ word for it and are encouraging everyone to line up for their "vaccines." At the time the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna products were approved, these pharmaceutical giants had failed to release most of the raw data from their vaccine trials. In fact, they are still withholding much of it. However, now that more of it is available for review, a different picture is emerging. British Medical Journal (BMJ) Associate Editor Peter Doshi, who had the opportunity to review the available data, pointed out the inconsistencies and weaknesses of the pre-approval trials. He concluded that rather than the widely publicized 95% effective rate, these "vaccines" are, at best, 19% effective. At this low rate, they would never have been approved! Health Bureaucrats Are Flying Blind There are still many unknowns about this experimental gene therapy. There is no indication that it saves lives or prevents spreading the infection to others, which is why health bureaucrats continue to recommend masking and social distancing. Nobody has any idea on the long-term, adverse effects of this experimental gene therapy, yet they are still plowing ahead with plans to vaccinate the entire population. This experimental gene therapy will not eradicate the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 any more than the flu vaccine has eliminated the flu. COVID-19 is here to stay. Even without this so-called "vaccine," infections will slow as more people develop natural herd immunity. Just Say "No!" Why in the world would you risk all the known and unknown, short and long-term side effects of an experimental gene therapy that was inadequately tested, rushed through the approval process at "warp speed," and found to be much less effective, yet much more dangerous than initially promised? I am advising my family, my friends and my guests here at the Hotze Health & Wellness Center to just say, "No!" COVID-19 infection poses no significant health risk except for infirm, elderly people and those with severe pre-existing conditions, not unlike the flu or any other respiratory infection. Most individuals who contract COVID-19 have mild to moderate symptoms for a few days, similar to the flu, and the overall survival rate of those who are infected is 99.98%. Of course, it is important to strengthen your immune system with vitamin and mineral supplementation, healthy eating, natural hormone replenishment, treatment of allergies, exercise, a good night’s sleep and maintaining your ideal body weight. Aside from that, let’s allow the virus to run its course so that we can develop herd immunity, which is far safer and more effective than this experimental gene therapy injection could ever be. The panic and mass hysteria created by government health bureaucrats, mainstream media, and politicians is all about control, power and money. I have written extensively about the ineffectiveness and dangers of wearing masks, social distancing, closing of businesses and lock downs. We need to get back to work, back to school and back to church. Dr. Hotze is the founder and CEO of the Hotze Health & Wellness Center in Houston, Texas www.hotzehwc.com References Selected Adverse Events Reported after COVID-19 Vaccination. CDC. Feb. 16, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/
  20. Makes no sense as I made no political commentary. posted an article written by a well known physician in Houston about the Vaccine and his view of it and his opinion on the data is being is incorrectly handled by officials. It is just a medical view point and a valid one. Evidently, there is no tolerance on this board for an anti "vaccine" opinion and I wonder why...... If in fact, a response became became political, then that one should have deleted. I think it is harmful to withhold a differing medical view point from people who want to make a health decision.
  21. Screen says I am not allowed to view the response to my post.
  22. I see that my comment about geography changed the original poster's topic, which I did not intend for it to do.
  • Create New...