ADJUSTING TO MEXICO
—Linked to Personality?
By Dr. M.I. Ehrlich
There are people who are able to adjust to life in Mexico and those who find living here a personal nightmare. While there are no clear-cut rules, there is a suggestion that those who are conformable with their extroversion, intuition, feelings and ability to “go with the flow” will generally fare better in Mexico. There are however, individuals with these personalities who cannot deal well with Mexico. Given this, one must assume that there are other, more basic personally traits which can help explain the adjustment differences.
Although unrelated to personality, the amount of accurate information the family received prior coming to Mexico is essential for a successful adaptation. There are basic personality traits which have a more direct relationship with the nature of one’s ability to thrive in Mexico. These traits include: the ability to be flexible, both in the sense of schedules and routines and in relation to one’s own identity, being tolerant and patient with people who have different habits, ideas, and ways of viewing life and relationships, a strong sense of adventure and a desire to learn, as well as having the good fortune of not being overly judgmental in terms of what is “right” and “wrong” or “good” and “bad”.
In trying to understand what leads a person to be flexible, tolerant, open to others, adventuresome, and willing to learn from and about others, I have come to the conclusion that humility is the primary ingredient. Humility in the sense that one has a deep-rooted belief that he/she is truly equal to everyone else and that no one culture, society, religion, social group, or nationality has a monopoly on truth.
Such humility is often based on an open and flexible self concept or self image. Those who judge Mexicans to be inferior in one way or another, do so as a result of exalting their own way of being or their manner of doing things. This “holier than thou” attitude is a defensive reaction to a basic and often unconscious feeling of insecurity in a sense, one holds on to his/her life because there is an underlying and erroneous belief that their sense of psychological wellbeing depends on such routines, habits, values, and ways of relating.
This sense of deprivation (that is, being deprived of one’s normal way of being and acting), often leads people to camouflage their anxiety and the feeling of being disconnected with anger and impatience towards external events such as traffic, pollution, informality of Mexicans, distrust of the household help or the inability to get things done on time. This is not to say that such events are not as troublesome or as infuriating to the well-adjusted. The well-adjusted, however, take such things in stride. It rarely provokes the emotional crisis typical in the poorly-adapted.
The more rigid we are in our demands for being someone of importance, being someone whose value and skills be instantly recognized, and for being someone who “deserves” to be treated with respect and deference, the more we are going to resist adapting to Mexico. The more we believe that our needs must be attended to regardless of the way things are down here, the more we will perceive Mexico as a hostile place to live.
Those who come to Mexico with a strong sense of Self, based upon a humbling awareness of both the favorable and less-than-favorable aspects of their personality, will usually be more accepting of other life styles. They will be more tolerant of other’s customs and habits, and feel less obligated to either accept or criticize them. They can maintain certain of their values without having to be critically defensive about why they are the way they are. The adage, “live and let live” is a natural part of their life as they know that no one is closer to God or blessed with “Universal Truth.”
The people who can adapt successfully to another country may even decide that they do not like living there. Their decision, however, is based upon having really given it a try and realizing that it is just “not for me.” No criticisms. No exaggerations. No implied inferiority. Just not for me.