Infrastructure in Jocotepec vs Ajijic
#1
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:06 PM
*the roads and streets in Joco are in good shape, with very few streets composed of cobble stones. They are smooth in many places, and even paved. I currently reside on Marcos Castellanos, 1/2 block from the church and LCS, and my neighborhood struggles to keep the cobblestone streets drivable. I found driving in Joco to be a whole lot easier and smoother.
*the sidewalks in Joco are wider and level, with smooth surfaces. I noticed right away at how much easier it is to walk around Joco. As I am a walker here in Ajijic, it is always necessary for me to pay very close attention to all the cracked brick, tile or concrete walkways, as they are falling apart, too narrow, or even non-existent.
*there are very few street dogs in Joco. It's not that I don't like dogs, I do. But there are quite a few homeless, scruffy street dogs here in Ajijic, and I only counted 2 on my walks around Joco. This also translates into much less dog doo on the sidewalks. Something I think we all can appreciate.
*there is very little trash along the streets or sidewalks, or in the plaza in Joco. I noticed people with trash cans inside their push carts, who walk around the streets sweeping up all the trash! The plaza has large trash receptacles, and people use them. I didn't see over-filled trash cans, and the sidewalks looked clean to me. As I walk around Ajijic, it is sometimes an obstacle course as there is so much trash here and there, and the few small trash cans mounted to the poles, are either over-filled, lacking trash bags, or removed from the poles.
*the malecon in Joco also has people who go around sweeping and cleaning and emptying the trash cans! (and they are large ones, so no spilling out on the sidewalks). I personally have spent numerous hours in my past 1 1/2 years here picking up the trash along the lake and along the malecon, and I can attest to the difficulty in finding a trash can to dispose of the numerous bags of trash I pick up.
So, I am wondering, just why is it, that the town of Joco's infrastructure is so different that Ajijic's?
I asked around to some old timers here, and was told that the town government in Joco actually spends the money they receive for the town on improvements and maintenance. And that the town government in Ajijic, a part of Chapala, does not. And that a lot of the money ends up in the pockets of greedy people instead of town improvements.
Perhaps you have a different or better explanation? I'd be curious to know what you think.
#2
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:15 PM
Sidewalks are not the responsibility of the municipal government in the Municipality of Chapala. They belong to the homeowner and are his responsibility to maintain.
To have it otherwise, you might have to return to the USA and the associated higher taxation. Things are different here.
#3
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:15 PM
I can only guess that the current Mayor has allocated funds to promote these projects.
I will definitely go back to enjoy their Malecon once/week in the future.
Valerie
#4
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:21 PM
#5
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:21 PM
#6
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:24 PM
I suspect it is also more modern because it is not trying to be a cute little arty tourist destination but rather a modern village with nearby agribusiness bringing in additional income.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton
#7
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:28 PM
Many of the streets are "paved" with paver bricks which seem to last for a very long time and can be replaced individually if broken.Cobblestones last forever, can be removed for quick repairs and are 'quaint and traditional'. Where they've been paved over in Chapala, the pavement doesn't last. The cobblestone streets may be several hundred years old.
Sidewalks are not the responsibility of the municipal government in the Municipality of Chapala. They belong to the homeowner and are his responsibility to maintain.
To have it otherwise, you might have to return to the USA and the associated higher taxation. Things are different here.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton
#8
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:30 PM
I was impressed.
Ajijic is starting to look like a DUMP !!! I hate it... and its 'quaint ' cobblestones,and its garbage and inability to pull off the road to park at stores between Castellano and Tempesque - it really is an eyesore compared to Joco and Chapala.
#9
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:35 PM
Unfortunately, those pavers (adoquin) sink into the soft ground pretty easily; but, you are right, they are replaced easily. That said, cobblestones do serve to keep traffic at a slower pace on the smaller streets; an absolute necessity.
#10
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:39 PM
Not a critisim but curious: Why did you move from Joco to Chapala? I was thinking of going to Joco when I was looking for a house, but found a (cannot refuser price) house in La Floresta. I'm still thinking about Joco (fewer gringos).I lived in Joco for a couple of years, and would add that shopping is easier with dozens of well stocked tiendas for produce, meats, fish, dairy and general groceries. I haven't found anything close in Chapala.
I suspect it is also more modern because it is not trying to be a cute little arty tourist destination but rather a modern village with nearby agribusiness bringing in additional income.
#11
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:42 PM
Elizabeth Cady Stanton
#12
Posted 16 March 2012 - 05:46 PM
#13
Posted 16 March 2012 - 06:02 PM
#14
Posted 16 March 2012 - 06:13 PM
You can't compare Joco to Ajijic. As noted above, Joco and Chapala are the municipal seats, that's where most of the money goes. And in the case of Chapala, most of the Tapatios too. We are happy for Chapala to keep most of the crowds, traffic and noise on the weekends. Ajijic is much more peaceful, with the exception of a couple of bad apple "restaurants" who play loud amplified music too often and too late.
I'd like to see stepped up enforcement of sidewalk repair. In a few cases here lately, they have come around and told people to put sidewalks in. If they would also tell people to repair them, the walking situation would improve. However, it is a very old village, first settled around 1600. The streets are extremely narrow in the core, no getting around that. We just consider it good exercise and training for keeping sharp. To borrow a football term, we get to do a lot of "broken field" walking in Ajijic.
IMO Ajijic is vastly superior to Chapala when it comes to restaurants. And we also like our more intimate Malecon which has steadily improved over time. Long before the Chapala anti-graffiti effort began, volunteers here had succeeded in ridding our Malecon of graffiti. I'm pleased to report that the Chapala volunteers have made great strides in this direction as well. Shame on the Chapala government for allowing the taggers to blight the Malecons in both Chapala and Ajijic! Kudos to the volunteers for stepping up and getting the government's work done for them.
If bigger towns, more people, more daytime noise, more traffic, more shopping options is your thing, Chapala pr Joco are your places. For a more sedate and upscale setting, Ajijic fills the bill. There is a reason houses are more expensive there, many Mexicans and expats prefer the greener, quieter setting and are willing to pay for it. That's the beauty of this area, though, there is a setting and life style and price for practically everyone, from busy village, to less busy village, to beautiful view homes on the hillside. This variety is one of the things that we find most appealing about this area.
Oh and as for the dogs, most of the dog crap comes from either inconsiderate expat dog walkers or their employee dog walker that do not pick up the crap. I seriously doubt we have any more Mexican street dogs than anyplace else. Unfortunately, the majority of dog owners do little to clean up their pets messes or control their noise.
#15
Posted 16 March 2012 - 06:22 PM
#16
Posted 16 March 2012 - 07:28 PM
If anything, the right decision would have been to forget the housing requirements, and let the arroyos be arroyos.
Note also that the small garbage cans on the poles are a fairly recent addition, and a huge improvement. And they are emptied by volunteers. Chapala has always felt that Ajijic has enough people with money to take care of itself, but beyond that, overflowing cans is a sign of two things: many of the locals actually use them, instead of just tossing their garbage around, and: a lot of people are too lazy to deal with their own garbage and just stuff everything they have into these little cans, which are designed for foot traffic--not for household waste.
(I hope this post isn't so long it's boring...) Dogs. Tapatios come here and dump their dogs and cats constantly. Gringos let them run free when they leave for back north. This doesn't happen much in Joco because the tapatios main tourist area is this end, and there are far, far fewer gringos living in Joco.
#17
Posted 16 March 2012 - 07:45 PM
As to crime.....we consider ourselves safer here than we were ANYWHERE in the USA.
Our prices are lower and our produce is better; our restaurants are on the boring side of the page but we are only 17km from Ajijic. We don't pay our maid as much as Maincoons does....because she doesn't know who Maincoons is.
Land prices are lower if you know where to look. Most real estate agents know little if anything about the area.
Fred
#18
Posted 17 March 2012 - 06:00 AM
Jocotepec also has the added advantage, particularly with the road improvements that are in progress, of being a relatively short run to the upscale shopping area on Lopez Mateos Sur. Yep, Costco and Sams and Mega are definitely upscale here in Mexico.
And San Juan Cosala has some pretty good restaurants too just a few miles east of Jocotepec. Produce better? The quality of produce in general in Jalisco is better and cheaper than we had NOB. I sorta doubt there's a big difference along the lake. One of the advantages of living here--you eat better for less.
Yes, Jocotepec and Chapala are cheaper than Ajijic. So are Riberas and San Antonio. In fact they are all cheaper than Ajijic. So what?
Land prices are definitely higher in Ajijic. So are houses. There are a lot of larger houses on larger lots in Ajijic. Some folks seem to think there's something strange about the higher prices. Look in any more upscale area NOB. Everything including houses, land, shops and often even gasoline costs more. Same is true of GDL or any Mexican city. Nothing unusual about that. Prices are very high in Chula Vista, which is not in Ajijic, for the same reasons. Fancier neighborhood, bigger houses.
Ajijic has sewers as do Jocotepec and Chapala. Riberas may have them soon. I keep hearing about how those huge townhouse developments just east of Jocotepec are overloading the treatment plants. We are grateful that there are no such developments in Chapala even though it appears the area is going to have to cope with that potentially disastrous mountainside hotel/casino. At least until it washes down to the Libremiento one summer.
RV Gringo reports that power and internet are pretty reliable in Chapala. I think they are less reliable in Ajijic though improving. Our power comes from the east out of La Floresta where the many trees cause problems with the power lines during storms. I will say that the CATV has improved tremendously since we moved here. The phones and internet have always been pretty good. They finally got serious about tree trimming so the power is getting better.
And Fred, maybe you're not paying your maid enough. All of lakeside is relatively high cost compared to Mexico in general. Check how much cheaper things are on the south side of the lake.
#19
Posted 17 March 2012 - 10:36 AM
#20
Posted 17 March 2012 - 10:44 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










